4 Profiles
Pick your role. See exactly what agents replace.
Each profile maps concrete weekly tasks to a specific agent — with a realistic output sample you can use as a template today.
🚀Startup Founder
💼Consultant
🛰️Innovation Manager
📦Product Manager
| Task | Time before | With agent | Savings | Needs key? |
|---|
| Investor research & fit scoring | 6 hrs/week | 15 min | ↓ 95% | API key |
| Pitch narrative drafting | 8 hrs/deck | 45 min | ↓ 90% | API key |
| Market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM) | 4 hrs | 20 min | ↓ 92% | API key |
| Cold outreach personalisation | 3 hrs/batch | 10 min | ↓ 94% | API key |
| Competitive landscape sweep | 5 hrs | 25 min | ↓ 92% | API key |
| Grant / accelerator Go/No-Go | 2 hrs | Instant | ↓ 100% | Free · no key |
Before agents
- Build investor list manually from Crunchbase / LinkedIn
- Write each cold email from scratch — 20 min each
- Market sizing from reading 30 reports + Excel model
- Deck rewrite for every new investor vertical
- Miss application deadlines due to research overload
After agents
- Dream 100 investor list ranked by thesis fit in 15 min
- Personalised outreach sequences from company context
- TAM/SAM/SOM breakdown with cited sources
- Pitch narrative adapts to each investor's portfolio gaps
- Go/No-Go on every grant/accelerator — instant, free
🤖 Sample agent output — Investor Research Digest
INVESTOR RESEARCH DIGEST · Pre-seed Deep Tech · 2026-05-23
TOP 5 THESIS-FIT INVESTORS (ranked by portfolio adjacency)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#1 Kindred Ventures Fit: 98% Stage: Pre-seed–Seed
Thesis match: "infrastructure for the physical world" + dev tools
Portfolio gap: No geospatial/sensing play in current portfolio
Key partner: Kanyi Maqubela — posted on autonomous sensing last week
Suggested angle: Lead with infrastructure framing, not "AI for X"
Action: Connect via mutual (see note) · Draft personalised email ↓
#2 Lux Capital Fit: 94% Stage: Seed–A
Thesis match: Scientific frontier + hardware/software convergence
Portfolio adjacency: Sees (aerial robotics) · Outset Medical
Action: Apply to Lux Launch programme — deadline 2026-06-15
#3 Obvious Ventures Fit: 78% Stage: Seed
Note: Climate tech angle required — reframe narrative around
emissions/efficiency impact for highest resonance.
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Cold email draft for #1 (Kindred):
Subject: Pre-seed round — [Company] brings sensing infrastructure
to [market], no portfolio overlap
Hi Kanyi, I've been following your thesis on "infrastructure for the
physical world" and noticed Kindred has no sensing/geospatial play yet.
We're building [one-liner]. $[ARR] ARR, [X] design partners signed.
15 minutes this week?
| Task | Time before | With agent | Savings | Needs key? |
|---|
| Proposal writing (scoping + price) | 10 hrs | 1 hr review | ↓ 90% | API key |
| Retainer pitch deck | 6 hrs | 30 min | ↓ 92% | API key |
| Thought leadership article | 4 hrs | 45 min | ↓ 81% | API key |
| Client market brief | 3 hrs | 20 min | ↓ 89% | API key |
| MOU / engagement letter draft | 3 hrs | 15 min | ↓ 92% | API key |
| Bid qualification (Go/No-Go) | 1 hr meeting | Instant | ↓ 100% | Free · no key |
Before agents
- 20+ hrs/week on unpaid BD writing
- Proposal win rate <25% — generic templates
- Retainer pipeline built on word-of-mouth only
- Decline interesting briefs — not enough time to scope
- Thought leadership stalls — writing takes too long
After agents
- Proposal first draft in 45 min — you review and refine
- Win criteria mapped to evaluation rubric automatically
- Retainer pitch auto-adapted to each client's sector
- Scope 3× more briefs — agents do the first pass
- Publish thought leadership at 2×/month cadence
🤖 Sample agent output — Proposal Blueprint
PROPOSAL BLUEPRINT · [Client]: Digital Transformation Strategy
Methodology: Blueprint v2.0 · Page limit: 12 · Win probability: HIGH
COMPLIANCE MATRIX
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
CR-01 Mandatory Proven track record in [sector] transformations
Status: COMPLIANT Citation: Section 2.1 — reference to 3 analogous projects
CR-02 Mandatory Fixed-price engagement with milestone payments
Status: COMPLIANT Citation: Section 4 — payment schedule table
CR-03 Preferred Experience with [regulation/framework]
Status: PARTIAL Action: Add 1-paragraph case study to Section 3
EVALUATION CRITERIA → SECTION MAP
Technical approach (40%) → Section 2 [PRIORITY — write first]
Track record (30%) → Section 3 [insert 3 case studies]
Price / value (20%) → Section 4 [justify rate vs. outcome]
Team (10%) → Section 5 [1-page bios]
SCOPING ESTIMATE
Discovery phase : 5 days @ €X/day = €Y
Strategy workshop : 2 days @ €X/day = €Y
Roadmap + delivery : 8 days @ €X/day = €Y
─────────────────────────────────────────
Total : 15 days — €[total]
Next step: Silver Review at day -7 before submission deadline.
| Task | Time before | With agent | Savings | Needs key? |
|---|
| Tender / grant monitoring (8 portals) | 15 hrs/week | Auto digest | ↓ 97% | API key |
| Go/No-Go bid qualification | 2 hr meeting | Instant | ↓ 100% | Free · no key |
| Consortium partner map | 1 week research | 1 hr | ↓ 94% | API key |
| Full proposal writing | 3–4 weeks | 2 hrs + review | ↓ 85% | API key |
| Tech transfer / commercialisation analysis | 5 hrs/report | 30 min | ↓ 90% | API key |
| GTM strategy for new service line | 3 days | 2 hrs | ↓ 88% | API key |
Before agents
- Manual portal checks — miss 40% of relevant calls
- Spend hours on bids that were never winnable
- Consortium built on existing contacts only
- Proposal writing monopolises senior expert time
- Tech transfer analysis delayed for months
After agents
- 100% portal coverage — ranked digest every morning
- Hard blockers surface in <60 seconds, not 2 hours
- Ecosystem map of 100 partners ranked by fit gap
- Proposal blueprint + compliance matrix in 45 min
- PMV and commercialisation pathway on demand
🤖 Sample agent output — Tender Screening + Go/No-Go
TENDER SCREENING DIGEST · 2026-05-23 · 3 CRITICAL MATCHES
🔴 CRITICAL ITT-2026-URBAN-001 — Smart City Sensing Platform
Agency: National Innovation Agency Budget: €2.4M Deadline: 2026-07-30
Fit: Direct match to sensing + data fusion expertise (TRL 5–7 required)
Action: Initiate Go/No-Go and assign lead this week.
🟠 HIGH H2026-BLOCKCHAIN-VERIFY — Decentralised Credential Verification
Agency: EU Digital Programme Budget: €800K Deadline: 2026-08-15
Fit: Blockchain-anchored audit trail aligns with core IP. Consider sub role.
🟡 MEDIUM SPACE-DATA-ANALYTICS-2026 — On-orbit Processing R&D
Agency: National Space Agency Budget: €1.1M Deadline: 2026-09-01
Fit: Adjacent — requires hardware partner. Worth a partnership call.
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
GO / NO-GO — ITT-2026-URBAN-001
Deadline feasibility : PASS (68 days — need 45)
Budget headroom : PASS (€280K available / €220K estimated)
Cardinal requirements : PASS (TRL 6 confirmed in product portfolio)
Expertise coverage : PASS (sensing in-house, AI partner identified)
──────────────────────────────────────────────
DECISION: GO — PROCEED TO FULL PROPOSAL
Next: Assign proposal lead · Silver Review at day -14 (2026-07-16)
| Task | Time before | With agent | Savings | Needs key? |
|---|
| Competitive intelligence sweep | 6 hrs/month | 25 min | ↓ 93% | API key |
| PRD / spec writing | 8 hrs | 1 hr review | ↓ 87% | API key |
| GTM strategy for new feature | 1 week | 2 hrs | ↓ 88% | API key |
| Market analysis (TAM/JTBD) | 5 hrs | 30 min | ↓ 90% | API key |
| Roadmap prioritisation brief | 3 hrs | 20 min | ↓ 89% | API key |
| Launch readiness Go/No-Go | Half-day meeting | Instant | ↓ 100% | Free · no key |
Before agents
- Competitive sweep = 30 open browser tabs + notes
- PRD writing blocks sprint planning — always late
- GTM strategy recycled from last quarter's template
- Roadmap prioritisation driven by loudest stakeholder
- Market sizing done once a year — always stale
After agents
- Weekly competitive digest auto-generated and shared
- PRD first draft from bullet points — review in 30 min
- GTM strategy with ICP, channels, and pricing signal
- RICE-scored roadmap brief from backlog + data
- On-demand market analysis for any new bet
🤖 Sample agent output — Competitive Intelligence Digest
COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE DIGEST · [Your Market] · May 2026
MARKET MOVEMENTS (last 30 days)
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
🔴 HIGH SIGNAL Competitor A raised Series B ($28M)
Implication: Will accelerate enterprise sales motion.
Your response: Accelerate [differentiator] messaging before they rebrand.
🟠 WATCH Competitor B launched [feature] in beta
Overlap: ~40% of your core user JTBD
Gap they leave: No self-serve onboarding — your edge to exploit.
🟡 LOW SIGNAL Competitor C acquired [tool] for $4M
Implication: Signal of platform consolidation in this segment.
JTBD COVERAGE MAP (% of user jobs served by each player)
[Your product] ████████████████░░░░ 82%
Competitor A ██████████████░░░░░░ 72%
Competitor B ██████████░░░░░░░░░░ 52%
PRICING INTELLIGENCE
Market median (per seat): $38–52/mo
Your position: Below median → pricing power exists at current NPS
Recommended test: +15% on annual plan for new cohorts
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. Ship [differentiator] before Competitor A's rebrand (est. Aug)
2. Add self-serve onboarding — capture Competitor B's dissatisfied users
3. Run pricing elasticity test on annual plan next sprint